The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) this week defended its policy position that carbon monoxide additives in meat are “generally†safe.
The FDA is facing mounting criticism from consumer groups over it decision in 2004 to allow food processors to use carbon monoxide as a means of keeping meat looking red and fresh. As reported last November by FoodProductionDaily.com the FDA is also dealing with a petition from a food and spice company calling for the regulator to rescind the decision on the grounds that the use of the gas could deceive consumers into buying or eating bad meat.
Since then some lawmakers have called on the FDA to review its decision. The moves could end up with the
During a media teleconference on Tuesday, Laura Tarantino, director of the FDA’s office of food additive safety, defended the meat industry's use of carbon monoxide.
“Color is not a good indicator… There are ways to tell meat is not fresh,†Tarantino said.
She said foul odors when a package is opened, texture or if the package bulges from gas buildup is a better indicator of meat that has gone bad. She said was unaware of any studies that linked consumer purchases with meat color or whether consumers were unwittingly buying bad products believing they were fresh.
Carbon monoxide is often used in modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) as a packaging technique for maintaining food quality by altering the atmospheric conditions within the package.
The MAP method works by replacing the air with a mixture of inert gases such as carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and nitrogen. The package is then heat sealed. The low-oxygen mix extends the shelf-life of the meat, vegetables and other perishable foods by up to 15 days from the normal five days, a big plus at a time when the market is working to ensure food safety and extend their markets.
However, carbon monoxide also makes meat appear fresher than it actually is by reacting with the meat pigment myoglobin to create carboxymyoglobin, a bright red pigment that masks any of the natural aging and spoilage of meats, according to a petition filed with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by Michigan-based Kalsec.
The FDA approved the practice as safe for use with packaged meats in 2004 in response to requests from two food companies. The EU prohibits food companies from using carbon monoxide.
Under current
“The use of carbon monoxide deceives consumers and creates an unnecessary risk of food poisoning by enabling meat and ground beef to remain fresh-looking beyond the point at which typical color changes would indicate ageing or bacterial spoilage,†Kalsec stated in its petition.
The petition urges the FDA to withdraw its July 2004 decision and related decisions allowing the use of carbon monoxide in meat packaging. The company argues that the FDA accepted the food companies' applications using a formula known as “Generally Recognized As Safe†(GRAS).
Under the GRAS application process the FDA does not conduct an independent safety investigation of its own, but instead relies on the notifiers’ claims, research and documentation in considering the safety of a product or process in food.
“Carbon monoxide simulates the appearance of freshness, so consumers may actually believe meat is fresh and safe when it may be neither,†stated Don Berdahl, Kalsec’s vice president and technical director. "We hope the FDA acts quickly to end this deceptive, potentially dangerous practice.â€
The company argues that consumers mainly chose their meat based on appearance, and specifically its color. The company says that the practice of treating meat with carbon monoxide could hide the growth of pathogens such as Clostridium Botulinum, Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7.
“If meat is bought spoiled, refrigerated improperly or used after these pathogens begin to grow, even proper cooking might not be sufficient to render the food safe to eat, because certain bacteria produce toxins that survive the cooking process,†the company stated.
The company also argues that the FDA should have done its own independent testing of the companies' scientific claims. Kalsec claims the FDA also did not have legal authority to permit the use of carbon monoxide in fresh meat packaging because it is an unapproved and prohibited color additive.
The agency bypassed the required procedure for carbon monoxide to obtain a color additive designation, a necessary precondition for making it legal to use carbon monoxide in fresh meat packaging, the company stated.
The
The use of carbon monoxide has been banned in other countries. In 2003, the EU prohibited the use of carbon monoxide for meat and tuna products. In its decision, the European Commission's food safety regulator stated that “the stable cherry-color can last beyond the microbial shelf life of the meat and thus mask spoilage.â€
Several countries including
“At the very least, the public has a right to know about the use of carbon monoxide in their food,†Berdahl stated. “If the FDA won’t prohibit it, the government should require a label that informs consumers about the presence of carbon monoxide and the health dangers it presents.â€
The American Meat Institute Foundation says the use of the gas is safe.
“The scientific evidence supports the safety of this packing technology,†said James H. Hodges, president of the American Meat Institute Foundation. “It is unfortunate that this competitive attack may create food safety concerns when there are none here.â€
The original application to the FDA to get approval for the use of carbon monoxide was submitted by Pactiv Corporation and Precept Foods.
The Consumer Federation of America and Safe Tables Our Priority have also called on the FDA to prohibit carbon monoxide. Some lawmakers are threatening to introduce legislation to ban the use of the additive unless the FDA revisits its decision to approve it.
In response to the criticism, retailer Kroger has decided to stop carrying ground beef products packaged with carbon monoxide reported OregonLive.com.